A Review of Research on the Application of Goal Setting in Organizations.
Abstract
Research on goal setting in organizations is reviewed in order to evaluate Locke's theory of goal setting and to determine the practical feasibility of this technique for increasing employee motiva...
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Certain properties of goals, such as their specificity and level, help to provide clear standards of adequacy.
“Certain properties of goals, such as their specificity and level, help to provide clear standards of adequacy (Latham & Yukl, 1975;Locke, 1968;Steers & Porter, 1974).”
From Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. (1981) · cites this paper as Latham & Yukl, 1975
A clear and inspiring understanding of what the organization should achieve in the future can be an important driver of employee action, performance, and motivation.
“a clear and inspiring understanding of what the organization should achieve in the future can be an important driver of employee action and performance (Latham and Yukl 1975; Locke and Latham 2002) and motivation (Wright 2007).”
From Leadership and motivation: a qualitative study of transformational leadership and public service motivation (2018) · cites this paper as Latham and Yukl 1975
Cites
Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives
Locke, E. A. (1968) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(68)90004-4 · Cited by 2,409 · see citing works
Motivational effects of knowledge of results: A goal-setting phenomenon?
Locke, E. A., Cartledge, N., & Koeppel, J. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026737 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation.
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586 · Cited by 2,675 · see citing works
Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems.
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017 · Cited by 1,511 · see citing works
Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis
Campbell, D. J. (1988) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1988.4306775 · Cited by 1,634 · see citing works
Andersen, L. B., Bjørnholt, B., Bro, L. L., & Holm-Petersen, C. (2018) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852316654747 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
- Authors
- Latham, G. P., & Yukl, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Weyerhaeuser (United States) (US)
- Baruch College (US)
- ORCID
- Latham, G. P.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1975-12-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 824-845
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2031619427
- Cited by
- 588
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 29.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Motivation
- Keywords
- goal setting, employee motivation, organizational management, performance evaluation (human resources), goal difficulty, goal specificity, feedback
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review