The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Corporate Contributions: Altruistic or For-Profit?
Abstract
Existing literature has focused on three rationales for corporate philanthropy: through-the-firm giving, corporate statesmanship, and profit motivated giving. The profit motivation argument was exa...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556659 · Cited by 5,130
Campbell, J. L. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275684 · Cited by 4,906
Godfrey, P. C. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.18378878 · Cited by 2,839
Galaskiewicz, J. (1985) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.11.080185.001433 · Cited by 553
Doing good deeds in times of need: a strategic perspective on corporate disaster donations
Muller, A., & Kräussl, R. (2011) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.917 · Cited by 385
Metadata
- Authors
- Fry, L. W., Keim, G. D., & Meiners, R. E.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1982-03-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 94-106
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2330696312
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporate Contributions: Altruistic or For-Profit? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/256026
- The paper
- Fry, L. W., Keim, G. D., & Meiners, R. E. (1982). Corporate Contributions: Altruistic or For-Profit? Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/256026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
