CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 709Competitive and Knowledge IntelligenceDecision Support System ApplicationsLibrary Science and Information Literacy

Variations in Decision Makers' Use of Information Sources: The Impact of Quality and Accessibility of Information.

O'Reilly, C. A.·1982·Academy of Management Journal
DOI 10.2307/256097
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Variations in the reported frequency of use of four information sources by decision makers was investigated. Although the perceived quality of information available for decision making was related ...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/256097

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research showed that under time pressure, managers may prefer to use sources of information that provide better accessibility to information but who might have a low perception of its quality in terms of accuracy, reliability, and timeliness.

    “Previous research showed that under time pressure, managers may prefer to use sources of information that provide better accessibility to information but who might have a low perception of its quality in terms of accuracy, reliability, and timeliness (Reilly, 1982).”

    From The Use of Dashboards in Performance Management: Evidence from Sales Managers (2012) · cites this paper as Reilly, 1982

  • Perceived data quality was measured in terms of data accuracy, reliability, completeness, and timeliness, consistent with Huh et al. (1990) and Reilly (1982).

    “Perceived data quality was measured in terms of data accuracy, reliability, completeness, and timeliness, which was consistent with Huh et al. (1990) and Reilly (1982).”

    From The Use of Dashboards in Performance Management: Evidence from Sales Managers (2012) · cites this paper as Reilly (1982)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Reilly, C. A.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
1982-12-01
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
756-771
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
DOI
10.2307/256097
OpenAlex
W2150964509
Cited by
709
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 29
FWCI
30.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
Keywords
information sources, decision-makers, information quality, information accessibility, management decision-making, information seeking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review