The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PEER REPORTING OF UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR: A SOCIAL CONTEXT PERSPECTIVE.
Abstract
This research hypothesized that two social context conditions influence group members' evaluations of peer reporting of unethical behavior and their own inclination to report peers: the misconduct threatens the interests of group members and peer reporting is denned as a role responsibility of group members. Two scenario studies provided mixed support for the hypotheses, results differing in the two hypothetical settings. In both studies, however, when subjects perceived a peer reporter as highly ethical, they simultaneously evaluated him or her as unlikable. Results of a field survey provided some support for the generalizability of the findings to an actual work setting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
Managerial values and corporate codes of ethics
Cressey, D. R., & Moore, C. A. (1983) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165032 · Cited by 316
Cited by
Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206306294258 · Cited by 1,837
Self-citationMORRISON, E. W. (1994) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256798 · Cited by 1,253
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-005-0849-1 · Cited by 854
Academic Dishonesty in Graduate Business Programs: Prevalence, Causes, and Proposed Action
McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Treviño, L. K. (2006) · Academy of Management Learning & Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2006.22697018 · Cited by 720
Kaptein, M. (2008) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.520 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Trevino, L. K., & Victor, B.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1992-03-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-64
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2314461516
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PEER REPORTING OF UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR: A SOCIAL CONTEXT PERSPECTIVE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/256472
- The paper
- Trevino, L. K., & Victor, B. (1992). PEER REPORTING OF UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR: A SOCIAL CONTEXT PERSPECTIVE. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/256472
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.