Cited by 720Academic integrity and plagiarismEthics in Business and EducationManagement and Marketing Education

Academic Dishonesty in Graduate Business Programs: Prevalence, Causes, and Proposed Action

McCabe, Donald L., Butterfield, Kenneth D., Treviño, Linda Klebe·2006·Academy of Management Learning & Education

Abstract

Little is currently known about cheating among graduate business students. We collected data from more than 5,000 business (mostly MBA) and nonbusiness graduate students at 32 colleges and universities in the United States and Canada during the 2002–2003 and 2003–2004 academic years to test a series of hypotheses regarding the prevalence of graduate business student cheating and reasons why these students cheat. We found that graduate business students cheat more than their nonbusiness-student peers. Correlation results found cheating to be associated with perceived peer behavior, as well as the perceived certainty of being reported by a peer, and the understanding and acceptance of academic integrity policies by students and faculty. But, regression analysis results suggest that perceived peer behavior has the largest effect. Drawing from these findings and past research on undergraduate students, we propose strategies that business schools and faculty can use to promote academic integrity in graduate business programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amle.2006.22697018

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Treviño, L. K.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Washington State University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Academy of Management Learning & Education
Published
2006-09
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
294-305
ISSN
  • 1537-260X (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9585
OpenAlex
W1978283268
Cited by
720
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 43
FWCI
58.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Learning and Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Management and Marketing Education
Keywords
academic dishonesty, cheating, graduate business students, MBA students, academic integrity, academic integrity policy, business schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review