The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DETERMINANTS OF ACQUISITION INTEGRATION LEVEL: A DECISION-MAKING PERSPECTIVE.
Abstract
Executives of 56 acquiring organizations participated in policy-capturing research that examined how the task, cultural, and political characteristics of acquisitions influence decisions about levels of integration. Although task-related characteristics entered most heavily into managers' decision models, cultural and political factors were also important. These results suggest that an understanding of acquisition integration is best achieved by viewing integration design decisions through multiple theoretical lenses. Furthermore, although industry and acquisition experience explained some variation in integration decision policies, results suggest that other individual or organization-level factors are also at work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,867
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,802
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.
O'Brien, D. P., & Williamson, O. E. (1976) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2230812 · Cited by 13,381
Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4277628 · Cited by 10,220
A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392088 · Cited by 7,917
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Shafer, G. R., Kahnerman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288362 · Cited by 5,657
Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness
Runkel, P. J., Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1976) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.2307/1978718 · Cited by 4,083
Cited by
Bauer, F., & Matzler, K. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2091 · Cited by 498
The Process of Postmerger Integration: A Review and Agenda for Future Research
Graebner, M. E., Heimeriks, K. H., Huy, Q. N., & Vaara, E. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2014.0078 · Cited by 466
Statistical power problems with moderated multiple regression in management research
Aguinis, H. (1995) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/0149-2063(95)90026-8 · Cited by 458
The double-edged sword of cultural distance in international acquisitions
Reus, T. H., & Lamont, B. T. (2009) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.25 · Cited by 451
On the Discursive Construction of Success/Failure in Narratives of Post-Merger Integration
Vaara, E. (2002) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840602232003 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- PABLO, A. L.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1994-08-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 803-836
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2012077992
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 27.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DETERMINANTS OF ACQUISITION INTEGRATION LEVEL: A DECISION-MAKING PERSPECTIVE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/256601
- The paper
- PABLO, A. L. (1994). DETERMINANTS OF ACQUISITION INTEGRATION LEVEL: A DECISION-MAKING PERSPECTIVE. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/256601
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
