The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
STAKEHOLDERS, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND PERFORMANCE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE AND THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES.
Open accessAbstract
The management of competing stakeholder interests has emerged as a significant topic in the management literature. Related issues are the relationship between stakeholder management and the perception that a firm is socially responsible, and the performance implications of both stakeholder management and social responsibility. Theory and models surrounding these issues are abundant, but empirical research is in an early stage. This research forum reports six excellent efforts to-tackle fundamental ideas about stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
FAMA, E. F. (1991) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04636.x · Cited by 5,350
STAKEHOLDER MISMATCHING: A THEORETICAL PROBLEM IN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE
Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995) · The International Journal of Organizational Analysis · doi:10.1108/eb028831 · Cited by 1,069
Cited by
Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2010.495581 · Cited by 2,755
Self-citationThe Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment
Peterson, D. K. (2004) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650304268065 · Cited by 781
Gast, J., Gundolf, K., & Cesinger, B. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.065 · Cited by 614
Jabbour, C. J. C., Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S., Sarkis, J., & Filho, M. G. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.010 · Cited by 576
Corporate reputation: A combination of social responsibility and industry
Melo, T., & Garrido‐Morgado, A. (2012) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.260 · Cited by 476
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1999-10-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 479-485
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2059254878
- Cited by
- 1,082
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 31.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STAKEHOLDERS, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND PERFORMANCE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE AND THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/256971
- The paper
- Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). STAKEHOLDERS, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND PERFORMANCE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE AND THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/256971
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
