The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RESEARCH NOTES. STAKEHOLDERS AND CORPORATE BOARDS: INSTITUTIONAL INFLUENCES ON BOARD COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE.
Abstract
This study examined the relationships between institutional influences and stakeholder representation on boards of directors. Data from 224 companies over the period 1984–94 were employed. Results indicate that variations in legal environments, industry regulation, and firm size are associated with stakeholder representation on boards but do not influence stakeholder representation on key board committees. Legal environments and firm size are associated with the adoption of stakeholder-oriented board committees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes
Oliver, C. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4279002 · Cited by 8,950
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258887 · Cited by 5,846
The Adolescence of Institutional Theory
Scott, W. R. (1987) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392880 · Cited by 3,699
Cited by
Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives
Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2003.10196729 · Cited by 3,213
Resource Dependence Theory: A Review
Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309343469 · Cited by 3,178
Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link?
Walls, J. L., Berrone, P., & Phan, P. H. (2012) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.1952 · Cited by 1,160
Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0322 · Cited by 833
Boardroom Diversity and its Effect on Social Performance: Conceptualization and Empirical Evidence
Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1272-z · Cited by 758
Metadata
- Authors
- Luoma, P., & Goodstein, J.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1999-10-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 553-563
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W1999851573
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 20.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RESEARCH NOTES. STAKEHOLDERS AND CORPORATE BOARDS: INSTITUTIONAL INFLUENCES ON BOARD COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/256976
- The paper
- Luoma, P., & Goodstein, J. (1999). RESEARCH NOTES. STAKEHOLDERS AND CORPORATE BOARDS: INSTITUTIONAL INFLUENCES ON BOARD COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/256976
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.