The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
KARASEK'S MODEL IN THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: EFFECTS OF JOB DEMANDS, CONTROL, AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES.
Abstract
A study of 1,200 employees from five Chinese cities found support for the cross-cultural applicability of Karasek's job demands-decision latitude model. The highest anxiety and depression were related to high job demands and low control, and the highest job satisfaction and life satisfaction were related to high job demands and high control. However, there were individual differences in the interactive effects of job demands and control and group differences in the applicability of the model, suggesting that Karasek's model needs to be amended and extended to take individual and socioeconomic differences into account. During the last two decades, job stress has been of particular interest to both academic researchers and practicing managers. Among the studies of the antecedents of stress, Karasek's (1979) job demands-decision latitude model has captured much attention. demands are defined as psychological stressors, such as requirements for working fast and hard, having a great deal to do, not having enough time, and having conflicting demands. ... Job decision latitude comprises two components: the worker's authority to make decisions on the job (decision authority), and the variety of skills used by the worker on the job (skill discretion). Operationally these
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind.
Triandis, H. C., & Hofstede, G. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393257 · Cited by 17,696
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
Cited by
KRISTOF‐BROWN, A. L., ZIMMERMAN, R. D., & JOHNSON, E. C. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x · Cited by 4,082
An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers.
Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65 · Cited by 2,154
Achieving Effective Remote Working During the COVID‐19 Pandemic: A Work Design Perspective
Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12290 · Cited by 1,722
“We note that the mean for job autonomy in the sample was 4.03 (on a 5-point scale), which is very high for Chinese workers who tend to usually have relatively lower levels of job autonomy (e.g., Xie, 1996).”
BackgroundInfluentialCarmeli, A. (2003) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940310511881 · Cited by 899
Thoresen, C. J., Kaplan, S. A., Barsky, A. P., Warren, C. R., & de Chermont, K. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.914 · Cited by 617
Metadata
- Authors
- XIE, J. L.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1996-12-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1594-1618
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2325543098
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: KARASEK'S MODEL IN THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: EFFECTS OF JOB DEMANDS, CONTROL, AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/257070
- The paper
- XIE, J. L. (1996). KARASEK'S MODEL IN THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: EFFECTS OF JOB DEMANDS, CONTROL, AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/257070
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
