The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Academic Life: Small Worlds, Different Worlds.
Abstract
The American professoriate is enormously differentiated by discipline and type of institution on such primary dimensions of professionalism as patterns of work, identification, authority, career, and association. Integration across the professoriate no longer comes primarily from similarity of function and common socialization, but from the overlap of subcommunities and the mediating linkages provided by the ties of discipline and institution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2010) · Cited by 1,886
Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career
Austin, A. E. (2002) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1353/jhe.2002.0001 · Cited by 1,347
Does a University Have a Culture?
Silver, H. (2003) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0307507032000058118 · Cited by 153
Churchman, D. (2006) · Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management · doi:10.1080/13600800500283676 · Cited by 92
Anderson, D. M., & Slade, C. P. (2016) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-015-9376-9 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Cole, S., Clark, B. R., & Boyer, E. L.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-12
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 684
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120200805
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 183.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
