The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation.
Abstract
Engineering Culture grew out of an attempt to take seriously the conceptual and methodological requirements of a cultural perspective on organizations. Briefly, the book is a critical ethnography of a large and successful high-tech corporation lauded in the popular managerial literature for its innovative postbureaucratic “corporate culture.” The corporate culture, the official story went, drove the company’s employees to peaks of corporate performance and personal self-actualization. Academic views of these managerial claims fell, unsurprisingly, into two distinct camps. On the one hand (the upper one, of course) were those who participated in the construction of this grand utopian narrative: numerous texts reinforced, jargonized, and legitimated managerial claims and fed them back to ever-hungry corporate consumers of good words. On the other hand, less popular but no less persistent and no less grand, was a continuing stream of criticism of the corporation. In this view, utopian managerial claims were—...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0806 · Cited by 1,364
Working at a Cynical Distance: Implications for Power, Subjectivity and Resistance
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2003) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508403010001376 · Cited by 835
1 Constitutional Amendments: “Materializing” Organizational Communication
Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520903047186 · Cited by 731
Explaining Michigan: Developing an Ex Post Theory of a Quality Improvement Program
DIXON-WOODS, M., BOSK, C. L., AVELING, E. L., GOESCHEL, C. A., & PRONOVOST, P. J. (2011) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00625.x · Cited by 603
Ashford, S. J., Caza, B. B., & Reid, E. M. (2018) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.001 · Cited by 582
Metadata
- Authors
- Ditomaso, N., & Kunda, G.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 369
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1991121241
- Cited by
- 1,374
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2580658
- The paper
- Ditomaso, N., & Kunda, G. (1995). Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation. Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580658
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.