Cited by 1,930Leadership and Management in OrganizationsJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and Leadership

Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings

Conger, Jay A., Kanungo, Rabindra N.·1987·The Academy of Management Review

Abstract

Charismatic leadership has been largely overlooked by organizational theorists. In part, the problem can be attributed to the lack of a systematic conceptual framework Drawing from political science, sociology, and social psychology, this paper addresses the problem by proposing a model linking organizational contexts to charismatic leadership. A series of research hypotheses is offered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/258069

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
The Academy of Management Review
Published
1987-10
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
637
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116969356
Cited by
1,930
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 92 · 2014: 85 · 2013: 91 · 2012: 95
FWCI
46.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
Keywords
charismatic leadership, organizational context, leadership theory, conceptual framework, research hypotheses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review