Cited by 157Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorBehavioral Health and InterventionsLeadership and Management in Organizations

The role of regulatory fit in visionary leadership

Open access
Stam, Daan Alexander, van Knippenberg, Daan, Wisse, Barbara·2010·Journal of Organizational Behavior

Abstract

It is generally argued that leader visions motivate followers by focusing on reaching desirable end‐states. However, it has also been suggested that visions may motivate followers by focusing on avoiding undesirable situations. In this paper we investigate the effects of appeals that focus on preventing an undesirable situation (i.e., prevention‐appeals) as well as appeals that focus on promoting a desirable situation (i.e., promotion‐appeals). We argue that the effectiveness of promotion‐ and prevention‐appeals is contingent on follower regulatory focus. In two experiments we show that prevention‐appeals lead to better performance than promotion‐appeals for more prevention‐focused followers, while the reverse is true for more promotion‐focused followers. We find this pattern for a dispositional measure of follower regulatory focus (Study 1) as well as for a manipulation of follower regulatory focus (Study 2). Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/job.624

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The success of a promotion or prevention appeal is dependent on the fit between leaders and followers' regulatory focus.

    “Research has shown that the success of a promotion or prevention appeal is dependent on the fit between leaders and followers regulatory focus (Stam et al. 2010).”

    From Energy Management of People in Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda (2011) · cites this paper as Stam et al. 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stam, D. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Wisse, B.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Stam, Daan Alexander
Venue
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-28
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
499-518
ISSN
  • 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1379
OpenAlex
W2154470854
Cited by
157
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
Keywords
regulatory fit, visionary leadership, leader vision, regulatory focus, follower motivation, leader-follower relationships, follower performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review