The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward an Appreciation of Collective Strategy
Abstract
The field of business policy has variously characterized the task of managing organization-environment relations as: (a) responding to exogenous environmental threats and opportunities, (b) negotiating resource interdepen-dencies with outside stakeholders, and (c) strategically maneuvering vis-avis competitors in industrial arenas. An alternative way of characterizing the task of managing organization-environment relations is offered. This focuses on the notion of collective strategy: the joint formulation of policy and implementation of action by the members of interorganizational collectivities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
Cited by
Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions
Oliver, C. (1990) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1990.4308156 · Cited by 2,408
Dyadic Business Relationships within a Business Network Context
Anderson, J. C., Håkansson, H., & Johanson, J. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251912 · Cited by 2,370
Discourse and Collaboration: The Role of Conversations and Collective Identity
Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Grant, D. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281426 · Cited by 698
Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (1998) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.9.2.217 · Cited by 614
Metadata
- Authors
- Astley, W. G.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1984-07
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 526
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2151454117
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
