The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Costs of CO 2 Emission Limits.
Abstract
In recent years a growing concern that the increasing accumulation of gases will lead to undesirable changes in global climate has resulted in a number of proposals, both in the United States and internationally, to set physical targets for reducing gas emissions. But what will these proposals cost? Based on the authors' earlier ground-breaking work, Buying Greenhouse Insurance outlines a way to think about greenhouse-effect decisions under uncertainty. It describes an insightful model for determining the economic costs of limiting carbon dioxide emissions produced by burning fossil fuels and provides a solid analytical base for rethinking public policy on the farreaching issue of global warming. Manne and Richels present region-by-region estimates of the costs that would underlie an international agreement. Using a computer model known as Global 2100, they analyze the economic impacts of limiting C02 emissions under alternative supply and conservation scenarios. The results clearly indicate that a reduction in emissions is not the sole policy response to potential climate change. Following a summary of the effect, its likely causes, and possible consequences, Manne and Richels take up issues that concern the public at large. They provide an overview of Global 2100, look at how the U.S. energy sector is likely to evolve under business-as-usual conditions and under carbon constraints, and describe the concept of greenhouse insurance. They consider possible global agreements, including an estimate of benefits that might result from trading in an international market in emission rights. They conclude with a technical description directed toward modeling specialists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Energy efficiency and consumption—The rebound effect—A survey
A. Greening, L., Greene, D. L., & Difiglio, C. (2000) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(00)00021-5 · Cited by 2,077
Rolling the ‘DICE’: an optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases
Nordhaus, W. D. (1993) · Resource and Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/0928-7655(93)90017-o · Cited by 567
Induced Innovation and Energy Prices
Popp, D. (2002) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282802760015658 · Cited by 206
Mitigation from a cross sectoral perspective
Change, I. P. O. C. (2012) · Climate Change 2007 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511546013.015 · Cited by 184
Endogenizing technological change: Matching empirical evidence to modeling needs
Pizer, W. A., & Popp, D. (2008) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2008.02.006 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Kafandaris, S., Manne, A. S., & Richels, R. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Operational Research Society
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 479
- ISSN
- 0160-5682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1552615161
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 83.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Costs of CO 2 Emission Limits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2584220
- The paper
- Kafandaris, S., Manne, A. S., & Richels, R. G. (1994). Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Costs of CO 2 Emission Limits. The Journal of the Operational Research Society. https://doi.org/10.2307/2584220
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.