The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers, 1907–1990
Abstract
We test three arguments about the effect of international politics on trade flows. The first argument states that trade flows are greater between states with similar interests than those with dissimilar interests, the second that trade flows are greater in democratic dyads than nondemocratic dyads, and the third that trade flows are greater between allies. We examine trade flows between the major powers from 1907 to 1990. This period provides variation on all three independent variables of interest and allows us to separate the three arguments empirically. We estimate a gravity model of trade with the above political variables added. Our results demonstrate that joint democracy and common interests increase trade in a dyad, but alliances generally do not, even when controlling for polarity of the system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
North, D. C. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808678 · Cited by 32,691
What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082979 · Cited by 6,840
Cited by
Democracy and Environmental Degradation
LI, Q., & REUVENY, R. (2006) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00432.x · Cited by 495
Space Is More than Geography: Using Spatial Econometrics in the Study of Political Economy
BECK, N., GLEDITSCH, K. S., & BEARDSLEY, K. (2006) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00391.x · Cited by 485
Trade Blocs, Trade Flows, and International Conflict
Mansfield, E. D., & Pevehouse, J. C. (2000) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081800551361 · Cited by 384
Bilateral Trade in the Shadow of Armed Conflict
Long, A. G. (2008) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00492.x · Cited by 124
Conflict, security, and political risk: International business in challenging times
Henisz, W. J., Mansfield, E. D., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2010) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2010.11 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Morrow, J. D., Siverson, R. M., & Tabares, T. E.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 649-661
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2170784187
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers, 1907–1990. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2585487
- The paper
- Morrow, J. D., Siverson, R. M., & Tabares, T. E. (1998). The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers, 1907–1990. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585487
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.