The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trust: The Connecting Link between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics
Abstract
Numerous researchers have proposed that trust is essential for understanding interpersonal and group behavior, managerial effectiveness, economic exchange and social or political stability, yet according to a majority of these scholars, this concept has never been precisely defined. This article reviews definitions from various approaches within organizational theory, examines the consistencies and differences, and proposes that trust is based upon an underlying assumption of an implicit moral duty. This moral duty—an anomaly in much of organizational theory—has made a precise definition problematic. Trust also is examined from philosophical ethics, and a synthesis of the organizational and philosophical definitions that emphasizes an explicit sense of moral duty and is based upon accepted ethical principles of analysis is proposed. This new definition has the potential to combine research from the two fields of study in important areas of inquiry.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2578601 · Cited by 4,163
Deutsch, M. (1958) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/002200275800200401 · Cited by 2,077
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
(2003) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275 · Cited by 5,715
E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust.
Gefen, D. (2000) · Omega · doi:10.1016/s0305-0483(00)00021-9 · Cited by 3,529
Harrison McKnight, D., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/s0963-8687(02)00020-3 · Cited by 2,164
Metadata
- Authors
- Hosmer, L. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hosmer, Larue Tone
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 379
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129125364
- Cited by
- 2,323
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 108 · 2014: 125 · 2013: 113 · 2012: 112
- FWCI
- 124.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- trust, moral obligation, organizational theory, philosophy of ethics, ethical principles, interpersonal behavior, group behavior, management effectiveness, economic exchange, social stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review