Multiple levels of analysis from a longitudinal perspective: Some implications for theory building
Abstract
Fred Dansereau, Francis J. Yammarino, Jeffrey C. Kohles, Multiple Levels of Analysis from a Longitudinal Perspective: Some Implications for Theory Building, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 2 (Apr., 1999), pp. 346-357
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Emerging perspectives for studying temporality in organizational research offer potential theoretical and methodological guidance for answering questions about timing, duration, and undermining of authentic leadership effects.
“Emerging perspectives for studying the role of temporality in organizational research (Barkema, Baum, & Mannix, 2002; Dansereau, Yammarino, & Kohles, 1999; Goodman, Ancona, Lawrence, & Tushman, 2001; Ropo & Hunt, 1999) offer potential theoretical and methodological guidance for answering these questions.”
From Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership (2005) · cites this paper as Dansereau, Yammarino, & Kohles, 1999
Cites
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.2.136 · Cited by 2,672 · see citing works
The Challenge of Innovation Implementation
Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259164 · Cited by 2,113 · see citing works
Glick, W. H. (1985) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4279045 · Cited by 1,286 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001 · Cited by 5,478 · see citing works
Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-the-science review
Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Uk Chun, J., & Dansereau, F. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.09.002 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
Self-citationA 25-year perspective on levels of analysis in leadership research
Dionne, S. D., Gupta, A., Sotak, K. L., Shirreffs, K. A., Serban, A., Hao, C., Kim, D. H., & Yammarino, F. J. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.002 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Dansereau, F., Yammarino, F. J., & Kohles, J. C.
- Affiliations
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Binghamton University (US)
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 346
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127160513
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 8.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
- Keywords
- multiple levels of analysis, longitudinal study, theory development, organizational theory, multilevel analysis, organizational change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
