Cited by 2,546Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorManagement and Organizational StudiesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations

Pierce, Jon L., Kostova, Tatiana, Dirks, Kurt T.·2001·The Academy of Management Review

Abstract

Building upon the observation that individuals feel ownership toward a variety of targets, we suggest that under certain conditions, organizational members can develop feelings of ownership toward the organization and various organizational factors. We define psychological ownership, identify its “roots” and the primary “routes” through which it develops, and propose certain organizational outcomes. We discuss the conceptual distinctiveness of psychological ownership from a set of related constructs and suggest some theoretical and managerial implications of our theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/259124

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota, Duluth (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Venue
The Academy of Management Review
Published
2001-04
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
298
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102719717
Cited by
2,546
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 284 · 2025: 241 · 2024: 205 · 2023: 217 · 2022: 191 · 2021: 219 · 2020: 149 · 2019: 127 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 106 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 67
FWCI
23.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
psychological ownership, organizational commitment, organizational identification, organizational outcomes, employee attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review