The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizational Identity and Learning: A Psychodynamic Perspective
Abstract
Organizations are prone to ego defenses, such as denial, rationalization, idealization, fantasy, and symbolization, that maintain collective self-esteem and the continuity of existing identity. These defenses are dysfunctional when they militate against necessary organizational change. Maladaptive identity defense mechanisms can be mitigated through processes of organizational learning in the form of critical self-reflexivity and an identity-focused dialogue, which promote attitudes of wisdom.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
(1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477 · Cited by 8,240
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Levels issues in theory development, data collection and analysis
Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258703 · Cited by 1,607
(1986) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9564-5 · Cited by 849
Wisdom: Its Nature, Origins, and Development
(1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173704 · Cited by 305
Cited by
Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development
Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.003 · Cited by 2,232
Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2014.873177 · Cited by 1,764
Investigating When and Why Psychological Entitlement Predicts Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior
Lee, A., Schwarz, G., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3456-z · Cited by 300
On the forgetting of corporate irresponsibility
Mena, S., Rintamäki, J., Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2016) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0208 · Cited by 209
Editors’ Comments: There Is Nothing So Theoretical As Good Practice—A Call for Phenomenal Theory
Ployhart, R. E., & Bartunek, J. M. (2019) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0087 · Cited by 114
Identity in Franchise Systems: The Role of Franchisee Associations
Lawrence, B., & Kaufmann, P. J. (2011) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2010.11.003 · Cited by 67
Anicich, E. M. (2022) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104138 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, A. D., & Starkey, K.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 102
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087233807
- Cited by
- 619
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 41.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
