The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Envisioning Power: Ideologies of Dominance and Crisis
Abstract
With the originality and energy that have marked his earlier works, Eric Wolf now explores the historical relationship of ideas, power, and culture. Responding to anthropology's long reliance on a concept of culture that takes little account of power, Wolf argues that power is crucial in shaping the circumstances of cultural production. Responding to social-science notions of ideology that incorporate power but disregard the ways ideas respond to cultural promptings, he demonstrates how power and ideas connect through the medium of culture. Wolf advances his argument by examining three very different societies, each remarkable for its flamboyant ideological expressions: the Kwakiutl Indians of the Northwest Pacific Coast, the Aztecs of pre-Hispanic Mexico, and National Socialist Germany. Tracing the history of each case, he shows how these societies faced tensions posed by ecological, social, political, or psychological crises, prompting ideological responses that drew on distinctive, historically rooted cultural understandings. In each case study, Wolf analyzes how the regnant ideology intertwines with power around the pivotal relationships that govern social labor. Anyone interested in the history of anthropology or in how the social sciences make comparisons will want to join Wolf in Envisioning Power.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Authorisation and the Process of Power: The View from African Archaeology
Fleisher, J., & Wynne-Jones, S. (2010) · Journal of World Prehistory · doi:10.1007/s10963-010-9038-y · Cited by 54
Holmes, D. R. (2019) · Focaal · doi:10.3167/fcl.2019.840105 · Cited by 20
Surplus: The Politics of Production and the Strategies of Everyday Life: An Introduction
Morehart, C. T., & De Lucia, K. (2015) · Surplus: The Politics of Production and the Strategies of Everyday Life · doi:10.5876/9781607323808.c001 · Cited by 16
Gramsci in and beyond resistances
Ciavolella, R. (2018) · Focaal · doi:10.3167/fcl.2018.820104 · Cited by 8
Stahl, A. B. (2015) · Surplus: The Politics of Production and the Strategies of Everyday Life · doi:10.5876/9781607323808.c011 · Cited by 7
Hope Henderson, H. (2017) · Revista Colombiana de Antropología · doi:10.22380/2539472x.10 · Cited by 6
Organización y espacios sociopúblicos incipientes: tres casos de los Andes
Dillehay, T. D. (2006) · Boletín de Arqueología PUCP · doi:10.18800/boletindearqueologiapucp.200601.002 · Cited by 3
Surplus Houses: Palace Politics in the Bight of Benin West Africa, AD 1650–1727
Norman, N. L. (2015) · Surplus: The Politics of Production and the Strategies of Everyday Life · doi:10.5876/9781607323808.c008 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Mann, M., & Wolf, E. R.
- Venue
- Contemporary Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 534
- ISSN
- 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982040419
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 101.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.