The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Wage Penalty for Motherhood
Abstract
Motherhood is associated with lower hourly pay, but the causes of this are not well understood. Mothers may earn less than other women because having children causes them to (1) lose job experience, (2) be less productive at work, (3) trade off higher wages for mother-friendly jobs, or (4) be discriminated against by employers. Or the relationship may be spurious rather than causal—women with lower earning potential may have children at relatively higher rates. The authors use data from the 1982–1993 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth with fixed-effects models to examine the wage penalty for motherhood. Results show a wage penalty of 7 percent per child. Penalties are larger for married women than for unmarried women. Women with (more) children have fewer years of job experience, and after controlling for experience a penalty of 5 percent per child remains. “Mother-friendly” characteristics of the jobs held by mothers explain little of the penalty beyond the tendency of more mothers than non-mothers to work part-time. The portion of the motherhood penalty unexplained probably results from the effect of motherhood on productivity and/or from discrimination by employers against mothers. While the benefits of mothering diffuse widely—to the employers, neighbors, friends, spouses, and children of the adults who received the mothering—the costs of child rearing are borne disproportionately by mothers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565
HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES: A Theory of Gendered Organizations
ACKER, J. (1990) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124390004002002 · Cited by 7,374
(1941) · Research in International Economics by Federal Agencies · doi:10.7312/schw92626-009 · Cited by 4,682
Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,662
Statistical Theories of Discrimination in Labor Markets
Aigner, D. J., & Cain, G. G. (1977) · ILR Review · doi:10.1177/001979397703000204 · Cited by 1,503
Occupational Self-Selection: A Human Capital Approach to Sex Differences in Occupational Structure
Polachek, S. W. (1981) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1924218 · Cited by 976
Understanding the ‘Family Gap’ in Pay for Women with Children
Waldfogel, J. (1998) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.12.1.137 · Cited by 865
Who Pays for the Kids?: Gender and the Structures of Constraint
Folbre, N. (1994) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203168295 · Cited by 855
Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint.
Roos, P. A., & Folbre, N. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076035 · Cited by 783
The Effect of Children on Women's Wages
Waldfogel, J. (1997) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657300 · Cited by 737
Cited by
Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?
Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/511799 · Cited by 2,525
Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100404 · Cited by 2,052
Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations
Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243204265269 · Cited by 1,823
Work and family research in the first decade of the 21st century
Bianchi, S. M., & Milkie, M. A. (2010) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00726.x · Cited by 1,145
Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives
Mills, M., Rindfuss, R. R., McDonald, P., te Velde, E., & on behalf of the ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force (2011) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr026 · Cited by 1,082
Metadata
- Authors
- Budig, M. J., & England, P.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 204-225
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8271
- OpenAlex
- W2135590639
- Cited by
- 2,279
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 86.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Wage Penalty for Motherhood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/000312240106600203
- The paper
- Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2001). The Wage Penalty for Motherhood. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240106600203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.