Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,553

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science

Mitchell, Jon P., Gupta, Akhil, Ferguson, James·1999·The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute

Abstract

Among social sciences, anthropology relies most fundamentally on fieldwork--the long-term immersion in another way of life as basis for knowledge. In an era when anthropologists are studying topics that resist geographical localization, this book initiates a long-overdue discussion of political and epistemological implications of disciplinary commitment to fieldwork. These innovative, stimulating essays--carefully chosen to form a coherent whole--interrogate notion of the field, showing how concept is historically constructed and exploring consequences of its dominance. The essays discuss anthropological work done in places (in refugee camps, on television) or among populations (gays and lesbians, homeless people in United States) that challenge traditional boundaries of the field. The contributors suggest alternative methodologies appropriate for contemporary problems and ultimately propose a reformation of discipline of anthropology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2661203

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,553

Metadata

Authors
Mitchell, J. P., Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J.
Venue
The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1999-12
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
675
ISSN
1359-0987 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070162908
Cited by
1,553
References
0
FWCI
278.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2661203
The paper
Mitchell, J. P., Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1999). Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. https://doi.org/10.2307/2661203

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.