The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Institutional and Rational Determinants of Organizational Practices: Human Resource Management in European Firms
Abstract
This paper tests predictions from institutional and rational perspectives about the adoption of organizational practices through a comparative study of human resource management in firms located in six European countries. Distinguishing between calculative practices—aimed at efficient use of human resources—and collaborative practices—aimed at promoting the goals of both employees and employer—the paper predicts differences in adoption across countries. Results show that institutional determinants, as indicated by the national embeddedness of firms, have a strong effect on the application of both calculative and collaborative human resource management practices. Firm size, a rational determinant, has a considerable impact on calculative practices, whereas the effect of industrial embeddedness is quite modest for both practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutional conditions for diffusion
Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. (1993) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/bf00993595 · Cited by 2,114
Cited by
Chuang, C.-H., Chen, S.-J., & Chuang, C.-W. (2013) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.04.002 · Cited by 98
A configural framework of practice change for B corporations
Sharma, G., Beveridge, '. J., & Haigh, N. (2018) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.008 · Cited by 86
For better or worse? Workplace changes and the health and well-being of Norwegian workers
Østhus, S. (2007) · Work, Employment and Society · doi:10.1177/0950017007082881 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Gooderham, P. N., Nordhaug, O., & Ringdal, K.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 507-531
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3815
- OpenAlex
- W1980228511
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
