Cited by 2,114Management and Organizational StudiesInnovation Diffusion and ForecastingPolicy Transfer and Learning

Institutional conditions for diffusion

Strang, David, Meyer, John W.·1993·Theory and Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00993595

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Practices can diffuse widely on the basis of compelling theorization, and may then become impervious to disconfirming evidence.

    “Practices can diffuse widely on the basis of compelling theorization (Strang and Meyer, 1993), and may then become impervious to disconfirming evidence.”

    From Are Diversity Programs Merely Ceremonial? Evidence-Free Institutionalization (2017) · cites this paper as Strang and Meyer, 1993

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
Theory and Society
Published
1993-08
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
487-511
ISSN
  • 0304-2421 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7853
OpenAlex
W2027398644
Cited by
2,114
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 165 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 101 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 92 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 110 · 2013: 97 · 2012: 111
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Theory and Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
Keywords
institutional conditions, diffusion, institutional change, social diffusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review