The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Presenting Structural Innovation in an Institutional Environment: Hospitals' Use of Impression Management
Abstract
This research examines how the first organizations to abandon an institutionalized, taken-for-granted structure and adopt a radically different form presented the innovation to important stakeholders. A content analysis of hospitals' annual reports reveals that organizations that differed on other dimensions uniformly made preventive use of defensive impression management in announcing the change to a diversified corporate structure. The organizations invoked coercive and mimetic pressures to account for and justify the new structure, and they associated the innovation with legitimated organizational activities. The findings make two contributions that link the “old” institutionalism and neoinstitutionalism: they point to organizational agency in the preventive use of the very institutional forces that create isomorphism and suggest the presence of institutional forces even during the early stages of innovation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
The antecedents of deinstitutionalization
Oliver, C. (1992) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069201300403 · Cited by 1,746
Cited by
Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159562 · Cited by 1,717
Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expectations
Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.49388995 · Cited by 1,557
Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.236 · Cited by 1,035
Keeping up Appearances: Reputational Threat and Impression Management after Social Movement Boycotts
McDonnell, M.-H., & King, B. (2013) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839213500032 · Cited by 618
ORGANIZATIONAL PERCEPTION MANAGEMENT
Elsbach, K. D. (2003) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(03)25007-3 · Cited by 277
Innovation in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Recent Research
Länsisalmi, H., Kivimäki, M., Aalto, P., & Ruoranen, R. (2006) · Nursing Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0894318405284129 · Cited by 262
The sandwich game: Founder-CEOs and forecasting as impression management
Collewaert, V., Vanacker, T., Anseel, F., & Bourgois, D. (2021) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106075 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Arndt, M., & Bigelow, B.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 494-522
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3815
- OpenAlex
- W2009714462
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.