Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 459

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology

Sosa, Ernest, Lewis, David·2000·The Journal of Philosophy

Abstract

Introduction 1. New Work for a theory of universals 2. Putnam's paradox 3. Against structural universals 4. A comment on Armstrong and Forrest 5. Extrinsic properties 6. Defining 'intrinsic' (with Rae Langton) 7. Finkish dispositions 8. Noneism or Allism? 9. Many, but almost one 10. Casati and Varzi on holes (with Stephanie Lewis) 11. Rearrangement of particles: reply to Lowe 12. Armstrong on combinatorial possibility 13. A world of truthmakers? 14. Maudlin and modal mystery 15. Humean supervenience debugged 16. Psychophysical and theoretical identifications 17. What experience teaches 18. Reduction of mind 19. Should a materialist believe in Qualia? 20. Naming the colours 21. Percepts and color mosaics in visual experience 22. Individuation by acquaintance and by stipulation 23. Why conditionalize? 24. What puzzling Pierre does not believe 25. Elusive knowledge Index.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2678398

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sosa, E., & Lewis, D.
Venue
The Journal of Philosophy
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2000-05
Volume
97
Issue
5
Pages
301
ISSN
0022-362X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050782790
Cited by
459
References
0
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.