The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Getting priority straight
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“if A wholly explains B then B supervenes upon A”
From Nomothetic Explanation and Humeanism about Laws of Nature (2020) · cites this paper as deRosset (2010, section 4)
Citations
Cites
American Philosophical Quarterly
(2023) · American Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.5406/21521123.60.4.09 · Cited by 3,225
Armstrong, D. M. (1996) · Nijhoff International Philosophy Series · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8733-4_5 · Cited by 1,971
Dancy, J. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0199270023.001.0001 · Cited by 1,677
Essence and Modality: The Second Philosophical Perspectives Lecture
Fine, K. (1994) · Philosophical Perspectives · doi:10.2307/2214160 · Cited by 1,383
Schaffer, J. (2009) · Metametaphysics · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199546046.003.0012 · Cited by 1,382
Ayer, A. J. (1972) · Philosophical Essays · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-00132-3_9 · Cited by 984
Monism: The Priority of the Whole
Schaffer, J. (2010) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.1215/00318108-2009-025 · Cited by 925 · cited 5×
“If Schaffer’s historical claims in Schaffer (2009a, 2010) are correct, then priority theory has a long and distinguished pedigree reaching back to Plato.”
BackgroundInfluentialMerricks, T. (2001) · doi:10.1093/0199245363.001.0001 · Cited by 811
Conceptual Analysis and Reductive Explanation
Chalmers, D. J., & Jackson, F. (2001) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.1215/00318108-110-3-315 · Cited by 691
Potter, M., & Lewis, D. (1993) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2219902 · Cited by 680
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Fine, K. (1994). Essence and modality. In: Tomberlin, J. E. (Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives: Logic and Language (Vol. 8, pp. 229–294). Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company.
- Kaplan, D. (1989). In: J. Almog, J. Perry, H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 481–564). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- van Inwagen, P. (1990). Material beings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Cited by
Against Grounding Necessitarianism
Skiles, A. (2015) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-014-9669-y · Cited by 420
“Louis deRosset (2010) offers a sophisticated version of this style of argument.39 Say that a confounding case for an explanatory proposal of the form ‘‘p because q1, q2,…’’ is any possible scenario in which ‘‘p’’ is false yet ‘‘q1’’, ‘‘q2’’,… are all true.”
BackgroundInfluentialGrounding: Necessary or Contingent?
Trogdon, K. (2013) · Pacific Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1111/papq.12009 · Cited by 286
Leuenberger, S. (2014) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2013.855654 · Cited by 329
Clark, M. J., & Liggins, D. (2012) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/ans086 · Cited by 149
Grounding, Explanation, and the Limit of Internality
Litland, J. (2015) · doi:10.1215/00318108-3147011 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- deRosset, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Vermont (US)
- Corresponding author
- deRosset, Louis
- ORCID
- deRosset, Louis
- Venue
- Philosophical Studies
- Published
- 2010-04-03
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-97
- ISSN
- 0031-8116 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0883
- OpenAlex
- W2054804254
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Philosophical Studies (publishedVersion)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
- Keywords
- ontological commitment, scientific ontology, ontological parsimony
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Getting priority straight. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11098-010-9538-8
- The paper
- deRosset, L. (2010). Getting priority straight. Philosophical Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-010-9538-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
