The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Daily Practice and Material Culture in Pluralistic Social Settings: An Archaeological Study of Culture Change and Persistence from Fort Ross, California
Abstract
This paper presents an archaeological approach to the study of culture change and persistence in multi-ethnic communities through the study of daily practices and based on a crucial tenet of practice theory-that individuals will enact and construct their underlying organizational principles, worldviews, and social identities in the ordering of daily life. The study of habitual routines is undertaken in a broadly diachronic and comparative framework by examining daily practices from a multiscalar perspective. The approach is employed in a case study on the organization of daily life of interethnic households composed of Native Californian women and Native Alaskan men at the Russian colony of Fort Ross in northern California. Recognizing that different opportunities and choices existed for household members in this colonial setting, we explore how they constructed their own unique identities by examining the spatial layout of residential space, the ordering of domestic tasks, and the structure of trash disposal. We argue that trash deposits and middens in built environments, which often accumulate through routinized tasks, present great promise for examining the processes of culture change and persistence in archaeology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Cited by
Culture Contact or Colonialism? Challenges in the Archaeology of Native North America
Silliman, S. W. (2005) · American Antiquity · doi:10.2307/40035268 · Cited by 254
Agency, practical politics and the archaeology of culture contact
Silliman, S. (2001) · Journal of Social Archaeology · doi:10.1177/146960530100100203 · Cited by 122
Archaeologies of Persistence: Reconsidering the Legacies of Colonialism in Native North America
Panich, L. M. (2013) · American Antiquity · doi:10.7183/0002-7316.78.1.105 · Cited by 99
Archaeology and the “Savage Slot”: Displacement and Emplacement in the Premodern World
COBB, C. R. (2005) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.2005.107.4.563 · Cited by 83
From Casta to Californio: Social Identity and the Archaeology of Culture Contact
VOSS, B. L. (2005) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.2005.107.3.461 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Lightfoot, K. G., Martinez, A., & Schiff, A. M.
- Venue
- American Antiquity
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-222
- ISSN
- 0002-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 2325-5064
- OpenAlex
- W2313156979
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.