Cited by 12Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesArchaeological and Geological StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

Social Formations, Modo de Vida, and Conflict in Archaeology

Ensor, Bradley E.·2000·American Antiquity

Abstract

The focus of archaeological investigation is shifting from generalizations about societies for comparative theory-building to the internal dynamics of societies. The generalizations made in processual archaeology have been attacked for ignoring conflict and the modo de vida: the concrete rhythms of daily life. As a result, the increased attention to internal dynamics is beginning to paint complex pictures of social relationships. A structural marxist approach that was associated with functionalism is reappraised and argued to be suitable for understanding the complexities of individual's daily lives and power relations. Rather than viewing social formations as systems comprised of multiple modes of production that influence one another, individuals are argued to have crossed between modes. The sets of social relations comprise the totality of people's daily experiences. Furthermore, within each mode of production are different recognizable variations that produce dynamic sets of relations. An application to the U.S. Southwest illustrates this social formations approach to modo de vida and conflict.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2694806

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Stone, 1993, 59, 65
  2. Sanoja Obediente, 1996, Tendencias del proceso urbano en las provincias de Caracas y Guayana, siglos XVI-XIX: el modo de vida colonial Venezolano., Revista de Arqueologia Americana, 11, 57
  3. Wilcox, 1987, The Hohokam Village: Site Structure and Organization,, 223
  4. Veloz Maggiolo, 1976, Medioambiente y adaptacion humana en la prehistoria de Santo Domingo, Tomo 1.
  5. Veloz Maggiolo, 1977, Medioambiente y adaptacion humana en la prehistoria de Santo Domingo, Tomo 2.
  6. Wilcox, 1991, Chaco and Hohokam: Prehistoric Regional Systems in the American Southwest,, 253
  7. Gasser, 1985, City of Phoenix Archaeology of the Original Townsite: Block 24-East,
  8. Sanoja Obediente, 1982, Modos de produccion precapitalistas en Venezuela., Boletin de Antropologia Americana, 6, 5
  9. Rubbo, 1975, Toward an Anthropology of Women,, 333
  10. Stavenhagen, 1966, Social Aspects of Agrarian Structure in Mexico., Social Research, 33, 225
  11. Thomas, 1985, Proceedings of the 1983 Hohokam Symposium,, 687
  12. McGuire, 1992, Death, Society, and Ideology in the Hohokam Community of La Ciudad, AD 800 to 1100.
  13. Vargas Arenas, 1989, Teoria sobre el cacicazgo como modo de vida: el caso del caribe., Boletin de Antropologia Americana, 20, 19
  14. Friedman, 1979, System, Structure and Contradiction.
  15. Cable, 1985, City of Phoenix, Archaeology of the Original Townsite: Block 24-East.
  16. Doyel D. E. , and Ensor B. E. (editors) 1997 Archaeological Survey in Districts 6 and 7 Gila River Indian Community: Research Orientation and Results, vol. 1. Cultural Resources Report No. 98. Archaeological Consulting Services, Tempe.
  17. Gregory, 1987, The Hohokam Village: Site Structure and Organization,, 183
  18. Henderson, 1987, The Hohokam Village: Site Structure and Organization,, 97
  19. Smith, 1995, The Prehistorical Archaeology of Heritage Square,, 151
  20. Draper, 1975, Toward an Anthropology of Women,
  21. Veloz Maggiolo, 1989, El mode de vida de los recolectores en la arqueologia del caribe (parte II)., Boletin de Antropologia Americana, 19, 83
  22. Service, 1971, Primitive Social Organization.
  23. Lazcano Arce, 1993, Identification arqueol6gica de un modo de vida: un estudio en Xochimilco., Boletin de Antropologia Americana, 28, 133
  24. Cable, 1982, City of Phoenix, Archaeology of the Original Townsite: Blocks I and 2,, 13
  25. Bate, 1978, Sociedad, formacion economico social y cultura.
  26. Sanoja Obediente, 1990, The Venezuelan Colonial Way of Life., Revista Arqueologia Americana, 2, 158
  27. Sires, 1987, The Hohokam Village: Site Structure and Organization,, 171
  28. Greenwald, 1993, Early Desert Farming and Irrigation Settlements: Archaeological Investigations in the Phoenix Sky Harbor Center: Special Studies, Synthesis, and Conclusions,, 197
  29. Cable, 1982, City of Phoenix, Archaeology of the Original Townsite: Blocks 1 and 2.
  30. Cable, 1984, City of Phoenix, Archaeology of the Original Townsite: The Murphy's Addition.
  31. Allen, 1985, City of Phoenix Archaeology of the Original Townsite: Block 24-East,, 127
  32. Doelle, 1987, The Hohokam Village: Site Structure and Organization,, 71
  33. Vargas Arenas, 1995, La arqueologia como ciencia social y su expression en America Latina., Revista de Arqueologia Americana, 9, 141
  34. Foladori, 1986, Proletarios y Campesinos.
  35. Godelier, 1975, Marxist Analyses and Social Anthropology,, 3
  36. Garret, 1983, Alicia: The History of a Piman Homestead,, 11
  37. Ensor B. E. , and Doyel D. E. 1997 Trends in Subsistence, Settlement, and Land Use. In Archaeological Survey in Districts 6 and 7 Gila River Indian Community: Research Orientation and Results, vol. 1, edited by Doyel D. E. and Ensor B.E. pp. 75–104. Cultural Resources Report No. 98. Archaeological Consulting Services, Tempe.
  38. Kahn, 1975, Marxist Analyses and Social Anthropology,, 137
  39. Dean, 1991, Exploring the Hohokam: Prehistoric Peoples of the American Southwest,, 61
  40. Foladori, 1983, Formas de valor y formas de intercambio., Cuadernos Antropologicos, 1, 49
  41. Sacks, 1975, Toward an Anthropology of Women,, 211
  42. hooks, 1990, Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics.
  43. Marx, 1981, The German Ideology.
  44. Wilcox, 1981, Snaketown Revisited.
  45. Cable, 1987, The Hohokam Village: Site Structure and Organization,, 21
  46. Remy, 1975, Toward an Anthropology of Women,, 358
  47. Doyel, 1991, Exploring the Hohokam: Prehistoric Desert Peoples of the American Southwest,, 231
  48. Smith, 1986, Reconstructing the Elements of Petty Commodity Production., Social Analysis, 20, 29
  49. Bate, 1990, Culturas y modos de vida de los cazadores recolectores en el poblamiento de America del Sur., Revista Arqueologia Americana, 2, 89
  50. Carrasco, 1978, Economia politico e ideologia en el Mexico prehispanico,, 15
  51. Cable, 1983, City of Phoenix, Archaeology of the Original Townsite: Block 28- North.
  52. Fried, 1967, The Evolution of Political Society.
  53. Vargas Arenas, 1986, Sociedad y naturaleza: en torno a las mediaciones y determinaciones para el cambio en las FES preclasistas., Boletin de Antropologia Americana, 13, 65
  54. Althusser, 1970, Reading Capital.
  55. McGuire, 1992, A Marxist Archaeology.
  56. Sanoja Obediente, 1974, Antiguas formaciones y modos de produccion venozolanos.
  57. Howard, 1982, Hohokam Community Patterns at La Ciudad de Los Hornos.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Ensor, B. E.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Ensor, Bradley E.
Venue
American Antiquity
Published
2000-01
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
15-42
ISSN
  • 0002-7316 (ISSN-L)
  • 2325-5064
OpenAlex
W2319264887
Cited by
12
References
78
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Antiquity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
social formation, social conflict, processual archaeology, structural Marxism, functionalism, modes of production, everyday life, power relations, interpersonal relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review