The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measures of Segregation
Abstract
We thank Robert J. Antonio, Hal Winsborough, Alma F. Taeuber, Alan Sica, Gordon Caldwell, and several anonymous referees for helpful comments and David Dickens, Mark Lederer, and Frank Monfort for programming assistance. The research was supported by grants from the Kansas University General Research Fund (3385-XO-0038 and 3062-XO-0038), the National Science Foundation (SES 8025543), the Center for Studies of Metropolitan Problems, NIMH (5R01 -MH-27880), and the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, DHEW (HEW-1 00-76-0196). Institutional support was pro-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A multidisciplinary survey on discrimination analysis
Romei, A., & Ruggieri, S. (2014) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888913000039 · Cited by 288
Different Teachers, Different Peers: The Magnitude of Student Sorting Within Schools
Kalogrides, D., & Loeb, S. (2013) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x13495087 · Cited by 201
Decomposing School Resegregation: Social Closure, Racial Imbalance, and Racial Isolation
Fiel, J. E. (2013) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122413496252 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- James, D. R., & Taeuber, K. E.
- Venue
- Sociological Methodology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1985
- Volume
- 15
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0081-1750 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2315854953
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
