Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 502

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Principles of Path Analysis

Land, Kenneth C.·1969·Sociological Methodology

Abstract

Sociologists have used for some time the methods of classical statistics in the interpretation of many varieties of sociological data. However, due to the lack of a procedure for incorporating statistical results into social theory, parameter estimates have seldom had a direct bearing on the evaluation and reformulation of sociological theory. This state of affairs has stimulated recent discussions of linear causal models as a procedure for bridging the gap between sociological theory on the one hand and the results of classical statistical analysis on the other. Although variations in emphasis exist, the essential idea of the causal model involves the construction of an oversimplified model of reality in the sense that the model considers only a limited number of variables

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/270879

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 502

Metadata

Authors
Land, K. C.
Venue
Sociological Methodology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1969
Volume
1
Pages
3
ISSN
0081-1750 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2331227348
Cited by
502
References
0
FWCI
28.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principles of Path Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/270879
The paper
Land, K. C. (1969). Principles of Path Analysis. Sociological Methodology. https://doi.org/10.2307/270879

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.