Cited by 11Colonialism, slavery, and tradeRace, History, and American SocietyAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Slavery, Race, and Equality: Jefferson and the Pathos of the Enlightenment

Diggins, John P.·1976·American Quarterly

Abstract

in 1785, referring to the privately printed Notes on the State of Virginia. cannot now say much about it, Adams continued, I think it will do its Author and his Country great Honour. The Passages upon slavery, are worth Diamonds. They will have more effect than Volumes written by Philosophers.' For almost two centuries American historians have ignored Adams' advice on the significance of the passages on slavery contained in Jefferson's random Notes. Not until Winthrop Jordan's White Over Black: American Attitudes Toward The Negro, 1550-1812, published in 1968, were the Notes thoroughly analyzed for their psychological as well as philosophical value. The same veil of ignorance had been draped over Jefferson's private life by historians, biographers, essayists, and even warts-and-all novelists. Is there rather that has been kept out of sight about Jefferson's relations with Negroes? Edmund Wilson asked John Dos Passos in 1950. Did he have close and unprincipled relations with those that were made up of brown extract from the lack of close relations with white people? I learn from the same source-and for the first time-that he had several mulatto children.2 Again it was only with the publication of Jordan's book that we learned not only something rather interesting in Jefferson's relations with blacks but discovered a complex pattern of behavior that turned out to be highly illuminating. John Adams was right for the wrong reason. After White Over Black, even mere intellectual historians must admit

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2712350

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Abolitionist rhetoric often presented slavery as a critical affront to increasingly fundamental ideals of freedom and liberty, which connected antislavery advocacy to burgeoning republican movements in a variety of contexts.

    “Abolitionist rhetoric often presented slavery as critical affront to these increasingly fundamental ideals, which connected antislavery advocacy to burgeoning republican movements in a variety of contexts (Brion Davis 1999; Diggins 1976; Dubois 2006; Roberts 2013).”
  • The presentation of freedom and liberty as the antithesis of slavery is at the core of global understandings of slavery through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

    “The presentation of freedom and liberty as the antithesis of slavery is at the core of global understandings of slavery through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Diggins, J. P.
Corresponding author
Diggins, John P.
Venue
American Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1976
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
206
ISSN
0003-0678 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2332254031
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › American Constitutional Law and Politics
Keywords
Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia, slavery, race, equality, Enlightenment, pathos, John Adams, racial attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review