The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Value Priorities and Religiosity in Four Western Religions
Abstract
Theological, sociological, and psychological analyses of religion suggest that religiosity associates positively with values that enhance transcendence, preserve the social order, and protect individuals against uncertainty, and negatively with values that emphasize self-indulgence and favor intellectual or emotional openness to change. On this basis, an integrated set of hypotheses was generated to relate religiosity to the importance that individuals attribute to 10 basic types of human values across religious groups. Hypotheses were largely confirmed in educated adult samples of Israeli Jews (n = 635), Spanish Roman Catholics (n = 478), Dutch Calvinist Protestants (n = 217), and Greek Orthodox (n = 400). Hypotheses also were largely confirmed in a representative West German sample (n = 1,807) with different measures of religiosity and values. The pattern of correlations was robust across subsamples divided by age, gender, education, and income, and for Lutheran Protestants and Roman Catholics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
Self-citation(1973) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,144
Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice.
Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.5.4.432 · Cited by 4,533
Toward a universal psychological structure of human values.
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.53.3.550 · Cited by 3,790
Self-citationThe Elementary Forms of Religious Life
Durkheim, E., & Swain, J. W. (1916) · The American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.2307/3405938 · Cited by 3,400
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.58.5.878 · Cited by 2,337
Self-citation(1951) · Toward a General Theory of Action · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674863507.c8 · Cited by 1,389
Guttman, L. (1968) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02290164 · Cited by 1,343
Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values.
Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022195261007 · Cited by 1,089
Self-citationSchwartz, S. (2002) · Psicodebate · doi:10.18682/pd.v2i0.514 · Cited by 695
Self-citation
Cited by
(1999) · Western CEDAR (Western Washington University) · Cited by 3,944
Vansteenkiste, M., Neyrinck, B., Niemiec, C. P., Soenens, B., De Witte, H., & Van den Broeck, A. (2007) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317906x111024 · Cited by 750
Value priorities and readiness for out-group social contact.
Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.437 · Cited by 514
Self-citationWhy Don’t We Practice What We Preach? A Meta-Analytic Review of Religious Racism
Hall, D. L., Matz, D. C., & Wood, W. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309352179 · Cited by 431
Relevancy and Measurement of Religiosity in Consumer Behavior Research
Mokhlis, S. (2009) · International Business Research · doi:10.5539/ibr.v2n3p75 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, S. H., & Huismans, S.
- Venue
- Social Psychology Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 88
- ISSN
- 0190-2725 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2330216214
- Cited by
- 760
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Value Priorities and Religiosity in Four Western Religions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2787148
- The paper
- Schwartz, S. H., & Huismans, S. (1995). Value Priorities and Religiosity in Four Western Religions. Social Psychology Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787148
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.