The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses: A Microwear Analysis.
Abstract
A major problem confronting archeologists is how to determine the function of ancient stone tools. In this important work, Lawrence H. Keeley reports on his own highly successful course of research into the uses of British Paleolithic flint implements. His principal method of investigation, known as analysis, was the microscopic examination of traces of use left on flint implements in the form of polishes, striations, and breakage patterns. The most important discovery arising from Keeley's research was that, at magnifications of 100x to 400x, there was a high correlation between the detailed appearance of microwear polishes formed on tool edges and the general category of material worked by that edge. For example, different and distinctive types of microwear polish were formed during use on wood, bone, hide, meat, and soft plant material. These correlations between microwear polish and worked material were independent of the method of use (cutting, sawing, scraping, and so on). In combining evidence of polish type with other traces of use, Keeley was able to make precise reconstructions of tool functions. This book includes the results of a blind test of Keeley's functional interpretations which revealed remarkable agreement between the actual and inferred use of the tools tested. Keeley applied his method of microwear analysis to artifacts from three excavation sites in Britain Clacton-on-the-sea, Swanscombe, and Hoxne. His research suggests new hypotheses concerning such Paleolithic problems as inter-assemblage variability, the function of Acheulean hand axes, sidescrapers, and chopper-cores and points the way to future research in Stone Age studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fitch, W. T. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511817779 · Cited by 594
Toward the Identification of Formation Processes
Schiffer, M. B. (1983) · American Antiquity · doi:10.2307/279771 · Cited by 580
Evidence for Early Hafted Hunting Technology
Wilkins, J., Schoville, B. J., Brown, K. S., & Chazan, M. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1227608 · Cited by 406
Handaxes: products of sexual selection?
Kohn, M., & Mithen, S. (1999) · Antiquity · doi:10.1017/s0003598x00065078 · Cited by 355
Systematic Pigment Use in the Middle Pleistocene of South‐Central Africa
Barham, L. S. (2002) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/338292 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Pitts, M., & Keeley, L. H.
- Venue
- Man
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1981-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 480
- ISSN
- 0025-1496 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2587149032
- Cited by
- 642
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 42.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses: A Microwear Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2801305
- The paper
- Pitts, M., & Keeley, L. H. (1981). Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses: A Microwear Analysis. Man. https://doi.org/10.2307/2801305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.