The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence for Early Hafted Hunting Technology
Abstract
Ancient Weaponry: Hafting, which allowed projectile points to be attached to a staff, was an important technological advance that greatly increased the functionality of weapons of early humans. This technology was used by both Neandertals and early Homo sapiens and is readily seen after about 200,000 to 300,000 years ago, but whether it was used by a common ancestor or was separately acquired by each species is unclear. Supporting use by a common ancestor, Wilkins et al. (p. 942 ) report that stone points in a site in central South Africa were hafted to form spears around 500,000 years ago. The evidence includes damaged edges consistent with this use and marks at the base that are suggestive of hafting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The revolution that wasn't: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior
Mcbrearty, S., & Brooks, A. S. (2000) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1006/jhev.2000.0435 · Cited by 2,718
Lower Palaeolithic hunting spears from Germany
Thieme, H. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/385807a0 · Cited by 834
Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses: A Microwear Analysis.
Pitts, M., & Keeley, L. H. (1981) · Man · doi:10.2307/2801305 · Cited by 642
Experimentation in the Formation of Edge Damage: A New Approach to Lithic Analysis
Tringham, R., Cooper, G., Odell, G., Voytek, B., & Whitman, A. (1974) · Journal of Field Archaeology · doi:10.1179/jfa.1974.1.1-2.171 · Cited by 471
A new Palaeolithic discovery: tar-hafted stone tools in a European Mid-Pleistocene bone-bearing bed
Mazza, P. P. A., Martini, F., Sala, B., Magi, M., Colombini, M. P., Giachi, G., Landucci, F., Lemorini, C., Modugno, F., & Ribechini, E. (2006) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2006.01.006 · Cited by 399
The origins of lithic projectile point technology: evidence from Africa, the Levant, and Europe
Shea, J. J. (2006) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2005.10.015 · Cited by 363
Getting to the point: Evolutionary change in prehistoric weaponry
Hughes, S. S. (1998) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/bf02428421 · Cited by 360
FISCHER, A., HANSEN, P. V., & RASMUSSEN, P. (1984) · Journal of Danish Archaeology · doi:10.1080/0108464x.1984.10589910 · Cited by 356
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-1017 · Cited by 342
The status of Homo heidelbergensis (Schoetensack 1908)
Stringer, C. (2012) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.21311 · Cited by 329
Cited by
Watts, I., Chazan, M., & Wilkins, J. (2016) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/686484 · Cited by 157
Self-citationZoon politikon: The evolutionary origins of human socio-political systems
Gintis, H., van Schaik, C., & Boehm, C. (2019) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2018.01.007 · Cited by 53
Duches, R., Nannini, N., Romandini, M., Boschin, F., Crezzini, J., & Peresani, M. (2016) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2016.01.005 · Cited by 39
Technological complexity and the global dispersal of modern humans
Hoffecker, J. F., & Hoffecker, I. T. (2017) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.21553 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilkins, J., Schoville, B. J., Brown, K. S., & Chazan, M.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2012-11-16
- Volume
- 338
- Issue
- 6109
- Pages
- 942-946
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2041924786
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 114.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for Early Hafted Hunting Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1227608
- The paper
- Wilkins, J., Schoville, B. J., Brown, K. S., & Chazan, M. (2012). Evidence for Early Hafted Hunting Technology. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227608
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.