Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 395

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biogeochemical Diversity Along a Riverside Toposequence in Arctic Alaska

Giblin, A. E., Nadelhoffer, K. J., Shaver, G. R., Laundre, J. A., McKerrow, A. J.·1991·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

Nitrogen and phosphorus pool sizes, distribution, and cycling rates were described and compared for six different ecosystem types occurring along a single toposequence in northern Alaska. The toposequence was located on a series of old floodplains of the Sagavanirktok River, in the northern foothills of the Brooks Range. From tussock tundra in the uplands, the toposequence passed through a relatively dry hilltop heath zone, a hillslope shrub/lupine/Cassiope zone, a footslope Equisetum zone, a wet sedge tundra, and a riparian shrub zone. A late—melting snowbank covered the hillslope site in early June of each year, and the sites consistently varied in soil temperature, soil moisture, thaw depth, and the seasonal pattern of soil thaw. The standing stocks of N, P, and C in soils of these six ecosystem types varied dramatically but not monotonically along the toposequence, as did the turnover rates of these elements. Several measures were used in comparisons of N and P availability, including soil solution concentrations, in situ accumulation on ion—exchange resins, and levels of KCI—extractable N and P. Annual rates of net N mineralization were assayed using a buried bag method, and ecosystem respiration was measured by trapping CO 2 in soda lime [NaOH + Ca (OH)2]. Soil P pools were characterized by sequential extraction methods into four major pools, including loosely bound P, Al— and Fe—bound P, primary mineral P, and organic P. Both N and P availability were low in all six ecosystems when compared with temperate forests or wetlands. Among ecosystems, however, there was considerable variation in the relative availability of N vs. P, and in the apparent relative importance of nitrate as a nitrogen source.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2937049

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 395

Metadata

Authors
Giblin, A. E., Nadelhoffer, K. J., Shaver, G. R., Laundre, J. A., & McKerrow, A. J.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-12
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
415-435
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W1980288987
Cited by
395
References
27
FWCI
16.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biogeochemical Diversity Along a Riverside Toposequence in Arctic Alaska. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2937049
The paper
Giblin, A. E., Nadelhoffer, K. J., Shaver, G. R., Laundre, J. A., & McKerrow, A. J. (1991). Biogeochemical Diversity Along a Riverside Toposequence in Arctic Alaska. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937049

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.