The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Geostatistical Tools for Modeling and Interpreting Ecological Spatial Dependence
Abstract
Geostatistics brings to ecology novel tools for the interpretation of spatial patterns of organisms, of the numerous environmental components with which they interact, and of the joint spatial dependence between organisms and their environment. The purpose of this paper is to use data from the ecological literature as well as from original research to provide a comprehensive and easily understood analysis of geostatistics' manner of modeling and methods. The traditional geostatistical tool, the variogram, a tool that is beginning to be used in ecology, is shown to provide an incomplete and misleading summary of spatial pattern when local means and variances change. Use of the non—ergodic covariance and correlogram provides a more effective description of lag—to—lag spatial dependence because the changing local means and variances are accounted for. Indicator transformations capture the spatial patterns of nominal ecological variables like gene frequencies and the presence/absence of an organism and of subgroups of a population like large or small individuals. Robust variogram measures are shown to be useful in data sets that contain many data outliers. Appropriate removal of outliers reveals latent spatial dependence and patterns. Cross—variograms, cross—covariances, and cross—correlograms define the joint spatial dependence between co—occurring organisms. The results of all of these analyses bring new insights into the spatial relations of organisms in their environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robust estimation of a location parameter
Huber, P. J. (1964) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177703732 · Cited by 7,228
Hawkins, D. M. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-3994-4 · Cited by 2,982
Cited by
Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment
Nathan, R., & Muller-Landau, H. C. (2000) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01874-7 · Cited by 2,094
Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists
Fortin, M.-J., & Dale, M. R. T. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511542039 · Cited by 991
Landscape Ecology: What Is the State of the Science?
Turner, M. G. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152614 · Cited by 990
Spatial Synchrony in Population Dynamics
Liebhold, A., Koenig, W. D., & Bjørnstad, O. N. (2004) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132516 · Cited by 965
Geostatistical Patterns of Soil Heterogeneity Around Individual Perennial Plants
Jackson, R. B., & Caldwell, M. M. (1993) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261666 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Rossi, R. E., Mulla, D. J., Journel, A. G., & Franz, E. H.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 277-314
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W2169359815
- Cited by
- 1,204
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 52.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geostatistical Tools for Modeling and Interpreting Ecological Spatial Dependence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2937096
- The paper
- Rossi, R. E., Mulla, D. J., Journel, A. G., & Franz, E. H. (1992). Geostatistical Tools for Modeling and Interpreting Ecological Spatial Dependence. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937096
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.