Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 395

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Trophic Position Model of Pelagic Food Webs: Impact on Contaminant Bioaccumulation in Lake Trout

Vander Zanden, M. Jake, Rasmussen, Joseph B.·1996·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

To test how well use of discrete trophic levels represents pelagic trophic structure, we compiled dietary data from >200 lake trout and pelagic forage fish populations and calculated a continuous (fractional) measure of trophic position for each population. Although discrete trophic levels qualitatively represent broad—scale patterns in trophic structure, pelagic food webs are characterized by complexity and omnivory, thereby limiting the ability of discrete trophic levels to quantitatively represent trophic structure in terms of mass transfer and energy flow. Lake trout trophic position, which ranged from 3.0 to 4.6, explained 85% of the between—lake variability in mean PCB levels in lake trout muscle tissue, providing a significant improvement over the use of discrete trophic levels as a predictor of contaminant levels. Having demonstrated the utility of trophic position, we developed a generalized t rophic position model of lake trout food webs. This approach eliminates minor trophic linkages, calculates a fractional measure of each species' trophic position, and aggregates species of similar trophic position into trophic guilds. This r ealized model represents trophic structure in terms of mass transfer and accounts for the complexity and omnivory that characterize aquatic food webs. In our trophic position model, smelt (a species of pelagic forage fish) were designated a trophic guild separate from other pelagic forage fish, due to their elevated trophic position. Separate consideration of smelt was supported by elevated lake trout trophic position, PCB, and Hg levels in lakes containing smelt. Consideration of omnivory caused biomagnification factors (BMFs) to be many times higher than BMFs that ignored omnivory. These omnivory—corrected BMF estimates appeared to be more consistent with values calculated using stable nitrogen isotopes (δ 15 N), an alternative continuous measure of trophic position. (δ 15 N) provided trophic position estimates that generally corresponded with our diet—derived estimates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2963490

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 395

Metadata

Authors
Vander Zanden, M. J., & Rasmussen, J. B.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-11
Volume
66
Issue
4
Pages
451-477
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W2077576708
Cited by
395
References
6
FWCI
13.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Trophic Position Model of Pelagic Food Webs: Impact on Contaminant Bioaccumulation in Lake Trout. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2963490
The paper
Vander Zanden, M. J., & Rasmussen, J. B. (1996). A Trophic Position Model of Pelagic Food Webs: Impact on Contaminant Bioaccumulation in Lake Trout. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/2963490

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.