The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Randomization Test for Phylogenetic Information in Systematic Data
Abstract
A randomization procedure is proposed to determine if sets of data used for phylogenetic analysis contain phylogenetically nonrandom information. The method compares the observed number of steps on a minimum length tree with the mean number of steps on minimum length trees derived from the same data set after character state assignments have been randomly permuted within each character. Such randomized data sets will exhibit exactly the same character state distributions as the original data but no phylogenetic information. In tests of 28 separate data sets using this procedure, the minimum lengths of each data set differed significantly from that expected for phylogenetically non-informative data in spite of the fact that observed consistency indices from the original data were as low as 0.230. The high correlation between number of steps per character on minimum length trees and number of taxa among the 28 original data sets is consistent with that expected if a more or less constant frequency of homoplasy occurs per character per taxon. This correlation implies that the consistency index may be an inappropriate, comparative measure of homoplasy among data sets. The observed pattern of increasing homoplasy with increasing numbers of taxa for the original data sets is curvilinear (when forced to pass through a fixed point for all data sets). This is qualitatively different from that expected for random data. Possible uses of the randomization techniques are suggested in cladistic studies using either compatibility analysis or parsimony.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An index of substitution saturation and its application
Xia, X., Xie, Z., Salemi, M., Chen, L., & Wang, Y. (2003) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00326-3 · Cited by 1,542
Phylogenetic Methods Come of Age: Testing Hypotheses in an Evolutionary Context
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Rannala, B. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5310.227 · Cited by 781
A fungal phylogeny based on 42 complete genomes derived from supertree and combined gene analysis.
(2006) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-6-99 · Cited by 475
Disparity as an evolutionary index: a comparison of Cambrian and Recent arthropods
Wills, M. A., Briggs, D. E. G., & Fortey, R. A. (1994) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s009483730001263x · Cited by 349
Pisani, D. (2004) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150490888877 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Archie, J. W.
- Venue
- Systematic Zoology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 239
- ISSN
- 0039-7989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122240788
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomization Test for Phylogenetic Information in Systematic Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2992285
- The paper
- Archie, J. W. (1989). A Randomization Test for Phylogenetic Information in Systematic Data. Systematic Zoology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2992285
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.