The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE HOME? THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF WORK AND NONWORK CREATIVITY SUPPORT TO EMPLOYEES' CREATIVE PERFORMANCE.
Abstract
We examined relations between creative performance and the extent to which employees received support for creativity from both work (supervisors/coworkers) and non-work (family/friends) sources. We also examined whether (1) employees' mood states mediated the support-creativity relations and (2) creative personality characteristics moderated these relations. Results demonstrated that work and nonwork support made significant, independent contributions to creative performance. Positive mood mediated these relations, and employees with less creative personalities responded most positively to nonwork support.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These studies are noteworthy because they showed under what contextual conditions employees with fewer creative personality traits exhibited greater creativity, thereby providing initial evidence that managers can in fact nurture and promote creativity in employees who are not naturally predisposed to be creative.”
From Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework (2014) · cites this paper as Madjar, Oldham, and Pratt (2002)
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314527128 · Cited by 3,103
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367 · Cited by 2,208
Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001 · Cited by 1,863
Self-citationHennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416 · Cited by 1,475
The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance.
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392 · Cited by 1,224
Metadata
- Authors
- Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 757-767
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2165138165
- Cited by
- 921
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 13.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Keywords
- creative performance, creativity support, workplace support, supervisor support, coworker support, family support, friends, mood states, creative personality, mediation, moderation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
