MAXIMIZING CROSS-FUNCTIONAL NEW PRODUCT TEAMS' INNOVATIVENESS AND CONSTRAINT ADHERENCE: A CONFLICT COMMUNICATIONS PERSPECTIVE.
Abstract
Increasing competition resulting from the global and technological nature of markets has heightened the need for businesses to rely on cross-functional new product teams to produce innovations in a...
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In new product development teams, collaborative communication characteristic of compromise and problem-solving is linked to increased innovativeness within teams.
“In an investigation of new product development teams, Lovelace, Shapiro, and Weingart (2001) discovered that collaborative communication -characteristic of compromise and problem-solving -was linked to increased innovativeness within teams.”
From Analysis of Conflict Management Styles and Organisational Performance (2025) · cites this paper as Lovelace, Shapiro, and Weingart (2001)
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,542 · see citing works
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532 · see citing works
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102 · see citing works
A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict
Jehn, K. A. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393638 · Cited by 4,050 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741 · Cited by 3,071 · see citing works
Self-citationNembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.413 · Cited by 2,385 · see citing works
Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250 · Cited by 2,273 · see citing works
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416 · Cited by 1,475 · see citing works
Hinds, P. J., & Mortensen, M. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0122 · Cited by 1,072 · see citing works
Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams
Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.6.615.24872 · Cited by 974 · see citing works
Trust, Connectivity, and Thriving: Implications for Innovative Behaviors at Work
CARMELI, A., & SPREITZER, G. M. (2009) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01313.x · Cited by 551 · see citing works
Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: A task-technology fit perspective.
Maruping, L. M., & Agarwal, R. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.975 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
SUBGROUP DYNAMICS IN INTERNATIONALLY DISTRIBUTED TEAMS: ETHNOCENTRISM OR CROSS-NATIONAL LEARNING?
Durnell Cramton, C., & Hinds, P. J. (2004) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(04)26006-3 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Gibson, C. B., Huang, L., Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091240 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Self-citationAyoko, O. B., Callan, V. J., & Härtel, C. E. J. (2008) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496407304921 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Toward a Meta-Theory of Creativity Forms: How Novelty and Usefulness Shape Creativity
Harvey, S., & Berry, J. W. (2023) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2020.0110 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
The Impact of Cultural Value Diversity on Multicultural Team Performance☆
KIRKMAN, B., & SHAPIRO, D. (2005) · Advances in International Management · doi:10.1016/s0747-7929(05)18002-0 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Self-citationWhen does virtuality help or hinder teams? Core team characteristics as contingency factors
Schaubroeck, J. M., & Yu, A. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.009 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Huang, H., Lai, M., Kao, M., & Chen, Y. (2012) · Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration · doi:10.1002/cjas.1229 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Analysis of Conflict Management Styles and Organisational Performance
(2025) · Journal of Management Changes in the Digital Era · doi:10.33168/jmcde.2025.0104 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- ORCID
- Weingart, L. R.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2001-08-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 779-793
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2021393658
- Cited by
- 1,003
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 61
- FWCI
- 27.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict Management and Negotiation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- cross-functional teams, new product development, team innovativeness, conflict communication, innovation management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
