The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Andean Value Systems and the Development of Prehistoric Metallurgy
Abstract
The rich development of metallurgical technology that arose and was sustained in the New World prior to the Spanish invasion in the 16th century took place in the Andean zone of western South America in that area which is today Peru, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Colombia. Although Andean peoples supported a highly sophisticated metallurgical tradition with the production of a broad range of metals and metal alloys, little interest or attention has been paid to Andean metallurgy, perhaps because archaeologists and historians cannot boast of a age or an iron age as characteristic of New World prehistory. Iron metallurgy was never developed in the Andes. Although both ancient varieties of bronze were invented there-the alloys of copper and arsenic and of copper and tin-and tin bronze was widely used and disseminated throughout its vast empire by the Inca dynasty, nevertheless these metals did not have the same impact on Andean civilization that they had among peoples of Europe and the ancient Near East.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“while indigenous Andean metalwork techniques were inseparable from concepts of material and purity (Lechtman 1984).”
From Art (Pre)History: Ritual, Narrative and Visual Culture in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe (2020) · cites this paper as Lechtman 1984
In the citing paper
“In both materials, whether metal or ceramic, a particular”
From Reverse engineering of ceramic anthropomorphic figurines from the tumaco archaeological tradition in southwest Colombia (2021) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hodder, I., & Hutson, S. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814211 · Cited by 929
Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology
Dobres, M., & Hoffman, C. R. (1994) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/bf02231876 · Cited by 429
“In fact, the object is not that object unless it contains within it the essential quali t y . . . " (Lechtman, 1984, p. 30).”
BackgroundInfluentialTHE CHALLENGE OF ‘TECHNOLOGICAL CHOICES’FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE APPROACHES IN ARCHAEOLOGY*
SILLAR, B., & TITE, M. S. (2000) · Archaeometry · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x · Cited by 266
“Furthermore, it should be remembered that the choices of materials and techniques are embedded within and, therefore, may be dependent on wider cultural values and ideological concepts that stretch well beyond any single technology (Lechtman 1984; Sillar 1996).”
BackgroundCostin, C. L. (2001) · Archaeology at the Millennium · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-72611-3_8 · Cited by 286
Archaeological Theory and Scientific Practice
Jones, A. M. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511606069 · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Authors
- Lechtman, H.
- Corresponding author
- Lechtman, Heather
- Venue
- Technology and Culture
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1984-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0040-165X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086049163
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Technology and Culture (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Archeology › Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Latin American history and culture
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
- Keywords
- Andean metallurgy, prehistoric metallurgy, Inca civilization, tin bronze, iron metallurgy, alloys, Andean civilization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review