Knowledge and Control: New Directions for the Sociology of Education

Young, Michael F. D.·1972·British Journal of Educational Studies

DOI 10.2307/3120251

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3120251

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.
Murphy, Dingwall, Greatbatch, Parker, & Watson (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2160 · Cited by 1,107
The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education
(2009) · doi:10.4324/9780203863701 · Cited by 600
Conceptualising teachers’ assessment literacies in an era of curriculum and assessment reform
Willis, J., Adie, L., & Klenowski, V. (2013) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-013-0089-9 · Cited by 196
Turning the tide: a socio-critical model and framework for improving student success in open distance learning at the University of South Africa
Subotzky, G., & Prinsloo, P. (2011) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2011.584846 · Cited by 159
Exploring the society–body–school nexus: theoretical and methodology issues in the study of body pedagogics
Shilling, C. (2010) · Sport, Education and Society · doi:10.1080/13573321003683786 · Cited by 99
“We Hatched in this Class”: Repositioning of Identity In and Beyond a Reading Classroom
Skerrett, A. (2012) · The High School Journal · doi:10.1353/hsj.2012.0008 · Cited by 45
Exploring curriculum change using discursive institutionalism – a conceptual framework
Nordin, A., & Sundberg, D. (2018) · Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/00220272.2018.1482961 · Cited by 44

Authors: Young, M. F. D.
Venue: British Journal of Educational Studies
Publisher: JSTOR
Published: 1972-06
Volume: 20
Issue: 2
Pages: 247
ISSN: 0007-1005 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.2307/3120251
OpenAlex: W2045007829
Cited by: 805
References: 0
FWCI: 12.52
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review