The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effective Teaching in Higher Education
Abstract
Assists academic staff to develop their effectiveness as teachers and improve their students' learning by giving practical guidelines and suggestions for teaching and a series of activities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dual coding theory and education
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/bf01320076 · Cited by 2,108
The validity of student evaluation of teaching in higher education. Love me, love my lectures?
Shevlin, M., Banyard, P., Davies, M., & Griffiths, M. (2000) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/713611436 · Cited by 322
On students’ (mis)judgments of learning and teaching effectiveness.
Carpenter, S. K., Witherby, A. E., & Tauber, S. K. (2020) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.12.009 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Betjemann, A., Brown, G., & Atkins, M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Studies
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1989-02
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86
- ISSN
- 0007-1005 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974430763
- Cited by
- 657
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 62.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effective Teaching in Higher Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3121364
- The paper
- Betjemann, A., Brown, G., & Atkins, M. (1989). Effective Teaching in Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.2307/3121364
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
