Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 748

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estimating Trait, Method, and Error Variance: Generalizing across 70 Construct Validation Studies

Open access
Cote, Joseph A., Buckley, M. Ronald·1987·Journal of Marketing Research

Abstract

The authors examine the construct validation results of 70 published data sets. The analysis shows that, on average, traits account for less than 50% of the variance in construct measures. These findings raise questions about the application of statistical techniques that assume minimal measurement error or do not properly model systematic measurement error.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002224378702400308

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 748

Metadata

Authors
Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R.
Venue
Journal of Marketing Research
Published
1987-08
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
315-318
ISSN
  • 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7193
OpenAlex
W2060635400
Cited by
748
References
2
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating Trait, Method, and Error Variance: Generalizing across 70 Construct Validation Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002224378702400308
The paper
Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1987). Estimating Trait, Method, and Error Variance: Generalizing across 70 Construct Validation Studies. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378702400308

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.