Cited by 26Helminth infection and controlParasites and Host InteractionsParasitic infections in humans and animals

The Whipworm as a Blood Sucker

Burrows, Robert B., Lillis, William G.·1964·The Journal of Parasitology

Abstract

Numerous Trichuris vulpis engorged with reddish or pinkish fluid have been found at necropsies of dogs. These worms, when cut, gave strong positive reactions to the benzidine test. Of hundreds of hookworms and whipworms, washed and cut, nearly all were positive with this test. Longitudinal and transverse sections of the slender anterior end of whipworms, when stained with the dilute trichrome stain, gave unmistakable evidence of having blood cells in the esophageal lumen; and a detailed study of the anterior end of the worms indicated the means whereby whipworms can penetrate blood vessels and suck blood. Though less voracious than hookworms, whipworms are, nonetheless, avid blood suckers. Inasmuch as anemia is associated frequently with whipworm infections, a number of investi- gators have sought evidence of blood in these worms. Askanazy (1896), using a special stain- ing technique on over 60 Trichuris trichiura from 12 human cadavers, demonstrated iron- containing pigment in the intestinal epithelial cells, but not in other organs. One whipworm had a doubtful positive; all others were def- initely positive. In addition, he reported a binucleate leukocyte in the worm esophagus in one section. Guiart and Garin (1909) and Garin (1913) obtained positive Weber reac- tions for blood in feces of Trichuris-infected patients, reported blood-engorged whipworms

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3276127

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Burrows, R. B., & Lillis, W. G.
Venue
The Journal of Parasitology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1964-10
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
675
ISSN
0022-3395 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018425969
Cited by
26
References
9
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Parasitic infections in humans and animals
Keywords
Trichuris vulpis, Trichuris trichiura, blood feeding, hookworm, anemia, iron-containing pigments
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood, Cecum, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Microscopy, Nematode Infections, Research, Trichuriasis, Trichuris

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review