The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diagnostic Medical Parasitology
Open accessAbstract
Section 1. Philosophy and Approach to Diagnostic Parasitology Why Perform This Type of Testing? Who Should Perform Diagnostic Parasitology Testing? Where Should Diagnostic Parasitology Testing Be Performed? What Factors Should Precipitate Testing? What Testing Should Be Performed? What Factors Should Be Considered When Developing Test Menus?Section 2. Parasite Classification and Relevant Body Sites Protozoa Nematodes Cestodes Trematodes Pentastomids AcanthocephalaSection 3. Collection Options Safety Collection of Fresh Stool Specimens Preservation of Stool Specimens Collection of Blood Collection of Specimens from Other Body SitesSection 4. Specimen Test Options: Routine Diagnostic Methods and Body Sites O&P Examination of Stool Specimens Other Diagnostic Methods for Stool Specimens Testing of Other Intestinal Tract Specimens Urogenital Tract Specimens Sputum Aspirates Biopsy Specimens Blood Culture Methods Animal Inoculation and Xenodiagnosis Antigen and Antibody DetectionSection 5. Specific Test Procedures and Algorithms Microscopy O&P Examination Specialized Stains for Coccidia and Microsporidia Larval Nematode Culture Other Methods for Gastrointestinal Tract Specimens Methods for Urogenital Tract Specimens Preparation of Blood Films Blood ConcentrationSection 6. Commonly Asked Questions about Diagnostic Parasitology Specimen Collection Specimen Processing Diagnostic Methods Organism Identification Reporting Proficiency TestingSection 7. Parasite Identification Protozoa Nematodes Cestodes TrematodesSection 8. Identification Aids
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Baron, E. J., Miller, J. M., Weinstein, M. P., Richter, S. S., Gilligan, P. H., Thomson, R. B., Bourbeau, P., Carroll, K. C., Kehl, S. C., Dunne, W. M., et al. (2013) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cit278 · Cited by 592
Vatandoost, H., Oshaghi, M. A., Abaie, M. R., Shahi, M., Yaaghoobi, F., Baghaii, M., Hanafi-Bojd, A. A., Zamani, G., & Townson, H. (2006) · Acta Tropica · doi:10.1016/j.actatropica.2005.11.002 · Cited by 135
Khairnar, K., Martin, D., Lau, R., Ralevski, F., & Pillai, D. R. (2009) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2875-8-284 · Cited by 101
Approximate Bayesian Computation Using Indirect Inference
Drovandi, C. C., Pettitt, A. N., & Faddy, M. J. (2011) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2010.00747.x · Cited by 100
Dipetalonema reconditum in the human eye
HUYNH, T. (2001) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.85.11.1384i · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Esch, G. W., Garcia, L. S., & Bruckner, D. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Parasitology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1994-02
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23
- ISSN
- 0022-3395 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021008139
- Cited by
- 882
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic Medical Parasitology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3283339
- The paper
- Esch, G. W., Garcia, L. S., & Bruckner, D. A. (1994). Diagnostic Medical Parasitology. The Journal of Parasitology. https://doi.org/10.2307/3283339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.