Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sources and Reservoirs of Toxoplasma gondii Infection on 47 Swine Farms in Illinois

Dubey, J. P., Weigel, R. M., Siegel, A. M., Thulliez, P., Kitron, U. D., Mitchell, M. A., Mannelli, A., Mateus-Pinilla, N. E., Shen, S. K., Kwok, O. C. H., Todd, K. S.·1995·The Journal of Parasitology

Abstract

Field studies were conducted on 47 swine farms in Illinois during 1992 and 1993 to identify sources and reservoirs of Toxoplasma gondii infection. Blood samples were obtained from swine and from trapped wildlife. Serum antibodies to T. gondii were determined using the modified agglutination test, incorporating mercaptoethanol. Antibodies to T. gondii (titer > or = 25) were found in 97 of 4,252 (2.3%) finishing pigs, 395 of 2,617 (15.1%) sows, 267 of 391 (68.3%) cats, 126 of 188 (67.0%) raccoons, 7 of 18 (38.9%) skunks, 29 of 128 opossums (22.7%), 6 of 95 (6.3%) rats, 3 of 61 (4.9%) white-footed mice (Peromyscus sp.), and 26 of 1,243 (2.1%) house mice (Mus musculus). Brains and hearts of rodents trapped on the farm were bioassayed in mice for the presence of T. gondii. Toxoplasma gondii was recovered from tissues of 7 of 1,502 (0.5%) house mice, 2 of 67 (3.0%) white-footed mice, and 1 of 107 (0.9%) rats. Feces of 274 cats trapped on the farm and samples of feed, water, and soil were bioassayed in mice for the presence of T. gondii oocysts. Toxoplasma gondii was isolated from 2 of 491 (0.4%) feed samples, 1 of 79 (1.3%) soil samples, and 5 of 274 (1.8%) samples of cat feces. All mammalian species examined were reservoirs of T. gondii infection. All farms had evidence of T. gondii infection either by detection of antibodies in swine or other mammalian species, or by detection of oocysts, or by recovery from rodents by bioassay. The possibility of transmission of T. gondii to swine via consumption of rodents, feed, and soil was confirmed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3283961

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Dubey, J. P., Weigel, R. M., Siegel, A. M., Thulliez, P., Kitron, U. D., Mitchell, M. A., Mannelli, A., Mateus-Pinilla, N. E., Shen, S. K., Kwok, O. C. H., & Todd, K. S.
Venue
The Journal of Parasitology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1995-10
Volume
81
Issue
5
Pages
723
ISSN
0022-3395 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985757233
Cited by
260
References
9
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sources and Reservoirs of Toxoplasma gondii Infection on 47 Swine Farms in Illinois. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3283961
The paper
Dubey, J. P., Weigel, R. M., Siegel, A. M., Thulliez, P., Kitron, U. D., Mitchell, M. A., Mannelli, A., Mateus-Pinilla, N. E., Shen, S. K., Kwok, O. C. H., & Todd, K. S. (1995). Sources and Reservoirs of Toxoplasma gondii Infection on 47 Swine Farms in Illinois. The Journal of Parasitology. https://doi.org/10.2307/3283961

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.