Cited by 135Bartonella species infections researchToxoplasma gondii Research StudiesParasitic Infections and Diagnostics

Seroprevalences of antibodies against Bartonella henselae and Toxoplasma gondii and fecal shedding of Cryptosporidium spp, Giardia spp, and Toxocara catiin feral and pet domestic cats

Open access
Nutter, Felicia B., Dubey, J. P., Levine, Jay F., Breitschwerdt, Edward B., Ford, Richard B., Stoskopf, Michael K.·2004·Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Abstract

Objective—To compare seroprevalences of antibodies against Bartonella henselae and Toxoplasma gondii and fecal shedding of Cryptosporidium spp, Giardia spp, and Toxocara cati in feral and pet domestic cats. Design—Prospective cross-sectional serologic and coprologic survey. Animals—100 feral cats and 76 pet domestic cats from Randolph County, NC. Procedure—Blood and fecal samples were collected and tested. Results—Percentages of feral cats seropositive for antibodies against B henselae and T gondii (93% and 63%, respectively) were significantly higher than percentages of pet cats (75% and 34%). Percentages of feral and pet cats with Cryptosporidium spp (7% of feral cats; 6% of pet cats), Giardia spp (6% of feral cats; 5% of pet cats), and T cati ova (21% of feral cats; 18% of pet cats) in their feces were not significantly different between populations. Results of CBCs and serum biochemical analyses were not significantly different between feral and pet cats, except that feral cats had a significantly lower median PCV and significantly higher median neutrophil count. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggested that feral and pet cats had similar baseline health status, as reflected by results of hematologic and serum biochemical testing and similar prevalences of infection with Cryptosporidium spp, Giardia spp, and T cati. Feral cats did have higher seroprevalences of antibodies against B henselae and T gondii than did pet cats, but this likely was related to greater exposure to vectors of these organisms. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;225:1394–1398)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/javma.2004.225.1394

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies have proved high prevalence rates, at least for T. cati, also in pet household cats.

    “recent studies have proved high prevalence rates, at least for T. cati, also in pet household cats [182-184]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Gross EM, Hoida G, Sadeh T. Opposition to trap-sterilize- release programs for feral cats (lett). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996;208: 1380-1381.
  2. Hughes JE. Feral cats (lett). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993;203: 1256-1257.
  3. Foil L, Andress E, Freeland RL, et al. Experimental infec- tion of domestic cats with Bartonella henselae by inoculation of Ctenocephalides felis (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae) feces. J Med Entomol 1998;35:625-628.
  4. Spain CV, Scarlett JM, Wade SE, et al. Prevalence of enteric zoonotic agents in cats less than 1 year old in central New York state. J Vet Intern Med 2001;15:33-38.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nutter, F. B., Dubey, J. P., Levine, J. F., Breitschwerdt, E. B., Ford, R. B., & Stoskopf, M. K.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Published
2004-11-01
Volume
225
Issue
9
Pages
1394-1398
ISSN
0003-1488 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128445424
Cited by
135
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bartonella species infections research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
Keywords
Bartonella henselae, Toxoplasma gondii, Cryptosporidium, Giardia, Toxocara cati, feral cats, pet cats, seroprevalence, fecal shedding, zoonotic parasites, hematological parameters, serum biochemistry
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Domestic, Animals, Wild, Antibodies, Bacterial, Antibodies, Protozoan, Cat Diseases, Cat-Scratch Disease, Cats, Feces, Female, Male, Toxoplasma, Toxoplasmosis, Animal, Seroepidemiologic Studies, Bartonella henselae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review